I once said that we often read articles or follow certain people, not because we want to learn new things, but to reaffirm what we already believe.
There are other times, however, we stumble across something we knew almost instinctively, but couldn’t articulate. There’s a sense of elation and even relief. Like we returned home after a long and arduous trek through a mountainous desert.
I see a lot of “questions” that present only two possible responses. For instance, I engaged in a discussion on Twitter about the “morality” of eating meat. Here’s part of the discussion:
Me: In short, I don’t think anyone should feel guilty ‘cuz they eat meat, anymore than a vegan should be made to feel guilty for not eating it.
B: Those are two very different consumer realities. One choice requires the funding of mass slaughter, the other does not.
Me: A bit tongue in cheek: Both require slaughter, because we also kill plants when we eat them.
B: Plants are not sentient. If you had to choose between eating your dog or eating a piece of corn, what would you pick? Prolly the corn, right?
Knowing this was an entrapment question, I nonetheless thought about it and responded:
Me: I’d use my dog to help me hunt for rabbit, duck, goose, and/or pheasant, and make a meal with that and the corn to share with my dog.
A lot of the arguments presented to Christians to either defend or condemn contain the same type of either/or options. They’re not designed to start a discussion, but to entrap. Memes like this one is an example:
Christians are supposed to study Jesus’ life so we know how to best live our own. That includes debating with Christians and non-Christians alike.
The Pharisees tried to entrap Jesus with their questions time and again, and he always found a “third way” that included scripture to show them their flawed thinking. He didn’t argue using their rules, and it is one reason they conspired to kill him.
The article that brought all this to clarity for me can be read here:
If we Christians want to win people over, and avoid people entrapping us with our own arguments, we need to quit playing by mercurial societal rules, and instead play by God’s rules.